The Constitution, through the 4th Amendment, protects all of us against unreasonable search and seizure. The courts have refined, expanded, and limited these protections drastically through the years. As such, the general rule is that a police officer must have a warrant before conducting a search. However, warrantless searches are allowed in many circumstances.
Probable cause, when it comes to search and seizure, is generally defined as the reasonable belief of a police officer that a crime has occurred. It is a necessary component for an officer to arrest someone without a warrant. In the traffic accident context, an example would be if upon arriving at the scene of an accident, a police officer smelled a strong odor of marijuana coming from the vehicle and saw a green leafy substance on the driver’s clothes. It is reasonable to assume from these facts that the driver possessed marijuana and therefore had committed a crime.
Incident to Arrest
You may have heard that a search was conducted “incident to an arrest.” In the above example, if the police officer decided there was probable cause to arrest the driver for marijuana possession, he would most likely be justified in conducting a search of the passenger compartment of the vehicle as well as searching the person of the driver and passengers. The courts have carved this exception to the rule out of the need to protect police officers as well as the need to effectively secure what would now be considered a crime scene.
The Plain View Doctrine
Another exception to the warrant requirement is known as the plain view doctrine. This legal concept simply means that if the items to be seized are in plain view, the police typically do not need a warrant. Using the same example, imagine that the police officer arrived at the accident scene and did not have any evidence of marijuana possession. In the course of his investigation, he saw a couple of plastic wrapped bales in the back seat that were filled with a green leafy substance. Chances are, he would be justified in searching the packages in that they were clearly visible to anyone who happened by the vehicle.
So, after all of this discussion, the answer remains that it depends. As a general rule, if, after an accident, a police officer asks to search your vehicle, you are usually well within your rights to refuse. This, of course, doesn’t mean that the officer won’t find a way to search the vehicle anyway. If you have been involved in an accident and your vehicle was searched without your consent, any charges that resulted from the search may not be valid. In a case like this, though, you need to be represented by a skilled defense attorney. Jad Sarsour has been defending Northern Virginians for over ten years in all manner of criminal cases. If you have been charged with an offense after an accident (with or without a search), give him a call today at (571)-261-7314 to set up your initial consultation. Let him examine the facts surrounding the charges and determine the best course of defense for you.